This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0425
Case T-425/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — KU v EEAS (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — EEAS staff — Psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Reasonable time — Liability)
Case T-425/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — KU v EEAS (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — EEAS staff — Psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Reasonable time — Liability)
Case T-425/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — KU v EEAS (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — EEAS staff — Psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Reasonable time — Liability)
OJ C 237, 20.6.2022, pp. 47–48
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 237, 20.6.2022, pp. 46–47
(GA)
|
20.6.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 237/47 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — KU v EEAS
(Case T-425/20) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - EEAS staff - Psychological harassment - Administrative investigation - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Rejection of the request - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment - Reasonable time - Liability)
(2022/C 237/59)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: KU (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt, R. Spáč, G. Pasqualetti and E. Orgován, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 17 September 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance and, secondly, compensation for the harm which she claims to have suffered as a result of psychological harassment.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders KU to pay the costs. |