This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/269/117
Case T-356/07: Action brought on 19 September 2007 — Pfizer v OHIM — Isdin (ISDIN 14-8.000)
Case T-356/07: Action brought on 19 September 2007 — Pfizer v OHIM — Isdin (ISDIN 14-8.000)
Case T-356/07: Action brought on 19 September 2007 — Pfizer v OHIM — Isdin (ISDIN 14-8.000)
SL C 269, 10.11.2007, p. 64–64
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
10.11.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 269/64 |
Action brought on 19 September 2007 — Pfizer v OHIM — Isdin (ISDIN 14-8.000)
(Case T-356/07)
(2007/C 269/117)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Pfizer Ltd (Sandwich, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, T. Dolde, lawyers, and M. Hawkins, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Isdin, SA (Barcelona, Spain)
Form of order sought
— |
Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 June 2007 in Case R 565/2006-1; and |
— |
order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘ISDIN 14-8.000’ for products in among others class 5 — Community trade mark No 1 243 633
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Isdin, SA
Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The national word mark ‘ISTIN’ for goods in class 5
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision insofar as it declared the invalidity of the Community trade mark
Pleas in law: Violation of the applicant's right to be heard pursuant to Article 73 of Council Regulation No 40/94 and violation of Article 52 read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of the regulation.