Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2007/269/117

    Case T-356/07: Action brought on 19 September 2007 — Pfizer v OHIM — Isdin (ISDIN 14-8.000)

    SL C 269, 10.11.2007, p. 64–64 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.11.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 269/64

    Action brought on 19 September 2007 — Pfizer v OHIM — Isdin (ISDIN 14-8.000)

    (Case T-356/07)

    (2007/C 269/117)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Pfizer Ltd (Sandwich, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, T. Dolde, lawyers, and M. Hawkins, Solicitor)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Isdin, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 June 2007 in Case R 565/2006-1; and

    —

    order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘ISDIN 14-8.000’ for products in among others class 5 — Community trade mark No 1 243 633

    Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Isdin, SA

    Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

    Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The national word mark ‘ISTIN’ for goods in class 5

    Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision insofar as it declared the invalidity of the Community trade mark

    Pleas in law: Violation of the applicant's right to be heard pursuant to Article 73 of Council Regulation No 40/94 and violation of Article 52 read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of the regulation.

    Top