Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62009TN0274

Case T-274/09: Action brought on 14 July 2009 — Deutsche Bahn v OHIM — DSB (IC4)

SL C 220, 12.9.2009, p. 38–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

12.9.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/38

Action brought on 14 July 2009 — Deutsche Bahn v OHIM — DSB (IC4)

(Case T-274/09)

2009/C 220/80

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Bahn AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: E. Haag, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSB (Copenhagen, Denmark)

Form of order sought

—

Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 April 2009 and the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 July 2007;

—

order OHIM to pay all the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred during the appeal and opposition proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: DSB

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘IC4’ for goods in Class 39 (application No 4 255 411)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘ICE’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 19, 37, 38, 39, 41 and 42 (Community trade mark No 170 605) and the German figurative mark ‘IC’ for services in Classes 39 and 42 (No 1 009 258)

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) since there is a likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

Top