Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0557

    Case T-557/08: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — mPAY24 GmbH v OHIM — Ultra (M PAY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark M PAY — Earlier Community and national word marks MPAY24 — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    SL C 221, 14.8.2010, p. 41–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.8.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 221/41


    Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — mPAY24 GmbH v OHIM — Ultra (M PAY)

    (Case T-557/08) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark M PAY - Earlier Community and national word marks MPAY24 - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    2010/C 221/66

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: mPAY24 GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: H-G. Zeiner, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ultra d.o.o. Proizvodnja elektronskih naprav (Zagorje ob Savi, Slovenia)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2008 (Case R 221/2007-1) relating to opposition proceedings between mPAY24 GmbH and Ultra d.o.o. Proizvodnja elektronskih naprav.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 September 2008 (Case R 221/2007-1) in so far as that decision dismissed the opposition brought by mPAY24 GmbH;

    2.

    Orders OHIM to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.


    Top