Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CA0105

Case C-105/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 June 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Freedom to provide services and free movement of capital — Articles 49 EC and 56 EC and Articles 36 and 40 of the EEA Agreement — Direct taxation — Taxation of interest received — Discriminatory treatment of non-residents — Burden of proof)

SL C 221, 14.8.2010, p. 2–2 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.8.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/2


Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 June 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-105/08) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom to provide services and free movement of capital - Articles 49 EC and 56 EC and Articles 36 and 40 of the EEA Agreement - Direct taxation - Taxation of interest received - Discriminatory treatment of non-residents - Burden of proof)

2010/C 221/02

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and M. Afonso, Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, J. Menezes Leitão and C. Guerra Santos, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and V. Kazlauskaitė-Švenčionienė, Agents)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 49 EC and 56 EC — Difference in treatment of taxation of interest paid to financial institutions depending on whether they are resident or not in Portuguese territory

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

3.

Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 116, 9.5.2008.


Top