Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62010TN0244

    Case T-244/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Tsakiris-Mallas v OHIM — Seven (7 Seven Fashion Shoes)

    SL C 221, 14.8.2010, p. 49–49 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    26/05/2010
    Date lodged:
    26/05/2010
    Author:
    Opći sud
    Form:
    Pravosudna informacija
    Authentic language:
    grčki

    14.8.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 221/49

    Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Tsakiris-Mallas v OHIM — Seven (7 Seven Fashion Shoes)

    (Case T-244/10)

    ()

    2010/C 221/79

    Language in which the application was lodged: Greek

    Parties

    Applicant: Tsakiris-Mallas Α.Ε. (Argiroupoli Attiki, Greece) (represented by: Ν. Simantiras, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Seven S.p.A. (Turin, Italy)

    Form of order sought from the General Court

    —

    annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)of 22 March 2010 in Case R 1045/2009-2

    —

    order that the application No 544581 for registration as a community trade mark of the figurative mark ‘7 Seven Fashion Shoes’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25 be accepted, and

    —

    order the parties opposing these proceedings to pay the costs, including the costs relating to the opposition and appeal proceedings before OHIM

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

    Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘7 Seven Fashion Shoes’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25 (application for registration No 5445481)

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the other party in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: Italian figurative mark ‘7Seven’, registration Νο 769 296, for goods in Classes 14, 16 and 18; and Italian figurative mark registration Νο 928116 for goods in Classes 16 and 18

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and rejection of the application for registration for goods in Class 18

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, since the Board of Appeal erred in finding that there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue; infringement of Article 65(2), read with Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009; infringement of Article 65(2) read in conjunction with Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 since the Board of Appeal entirely failed to examine the question to what extent Article 8(5) of the regulation did or did not apply.

    Top