Action brought on 5 January 2006 — Luigi Marcuccio v Commission of the European Communities

(Case F-2/06)

(2006/C 86/87)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant(s): Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: I. Cazzato, avvocato)

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicant(s) claim(s) that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the application, the applicant submits first of all that the contested decision is flawed by reason of manifest inconsistency and a complete failure to state reasons. In fact, even though on several occasions he had stated that he was committed to pursuing the procedure intended to confer upon him the benefits under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations and that he was available to be examined by the doctor appointed by the defendant, the defendant nevertheless found that the applicant was not committed to pursuing the procedure in question and therefore closed that procedure.

The applicant further alleges that the defendant infringed the law, given that there is no rule requiring an official who was the victim of an accident to contact directly the doctor appointed by the institution to fix an appointment.

Lastly, the applicant alleges that the defendant has infringed the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations, in that it failed to have due regard to the interests of the applicant and acted in a manner inconsistent with official duty.