Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62019TN0851

Case T-851/19: Action brought on 16 December 2019 – Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO – Sakkari (SAKKATTACK)

IO C 61, 24.2.2020, p. 49–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

24.2.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/49

Action brought on 16 December 2019 – Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO – Sakkari (SAKKATTACK)

(Case T-851/19)

(2020/C 61/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Labesius, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Maria Sakkari (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark SAKKATTACK in the colours black, red, yellow, white and grey – Application for registration No 16 603 557

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 October 2019 in Case R 2560/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

order the joinder of the present case with case T-788/19;

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Infringement of Article 37(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

—

Infringement of the rule of equal treatment and sound administration;

—

Infringement of Article 94(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Top