This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0024
Case T-24/17: Action brought on 17 January 2017 — LA Superquimica v EUIPO — D-Tack (D-TACK)
Case T-24/17: Action brought on 17 January 2017 — LA Superquimica v EUIPO — D-Tack (D-TACK)
Case T-24/17: Action brought on 17 January 2017 — LA Superquimica v EUIPO — D-Tack (D-TACK)
IO C 86, 20.3.2017, p. 30–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.3.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 86/30 |
Action brought on 17 January 2017 — LA Superquimica v EUIPO — D-Tack (D-TACK)
(Case T-24/17)
(2017/C 086/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: LA Superquimica, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: D-Tack GmbH (Hüttlingen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘D-TACK’ — Application for registration No 9 650 847
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 November 2016 in Case R 1983/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the EUIPO decision dated 15/11/2016; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and those whose oppose this request to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
The Board of Appeal failed to consider Sitadex extracts concerning Spanish trade mark registration Nos: 2515958, 2516679, 2542249, 2591412 and 2668711 submitted by the applicant; |
|
— |
The Board of Appeal failed to consider the proof of use submitted by the applicant. |