EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TA0117
Case T-117/17: Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2019 — Proximus v Council (Public service contracts — Negotiated procedure — Most economically advantageous tender — Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer — Discretion of a contracting authority — Lawfulness of the evaluation method — Principle of sound financial management)
Case T-117/17: Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2019 — Proximus v Council (Public service contracts — Negotiated procedure — Most economically advantageous tender — Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer — Discretion of a contracting authority — Lawfulness of the evaluation method — Principle of sound financial management)
Case T-117/17: Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2019 — Proximus v Council (Public service contracts — Negotiated procedure — Most economically advantageous tender — Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer — Discretion of a contracting authority — Lawfulness of the evaluation method — Principle of sound financial management)
IO C 103, 18.3.2019, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.3.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 103/24 |
Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2019 — Proximus v Council
(Case T-117/17) (1)
((Public service contracts - Negotiated procedure - Most economically advantageous tender - Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer - Discretion of a contracting authority - Lawfulness of the evaluation method - Principle of sound financial management))
(2019/C 103/30)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Proximus SA/NV (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Schutyser, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Jaume and S. Cholakova, acting as Agents, and by P. de Bandt, P. Teerlinck and M. Gherghinaru, lawyers)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Council of 23 December 2016 to award the framework contract for the provision of cybersecurity services [confidential], to another tenderer.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
|
2. |
Orders Proximus SA/NV to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures. |