EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0417
Case T-417/14: Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Afar 4 v Commission
Case T-417/14: Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Afar 4 v Commission
Case T-417/14: Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Afar 4 v Commission
IO C 253, 4.8.2014, p. 55–56
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
4.8.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 253/55 |
Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Afar 4 v Commission
(Case T-417/14)
2014/C 253/73
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Afar 4, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. López Gómez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision; |
— |
in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
— |
in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery; |
— |
in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law; |
— |
in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities, in full or in such a way as to limit the bar on passing on the burden of recovery to the profitability of the operations; and |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera SA v Commission.