EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CA0194
Case C-194/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2015 — AC Treuhand AG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European tin stabiliser and ESBO/esters heat stabiliser markets — Article 81(1) EC — Scope — Consultancy firm not operating on the relevant markets — Definition of ‘agreement between undertakings’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Calculation of the amount of fines — The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Case C-194/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2015 — AC Treuhand AG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European tin stabiliser and ESBO/esters heat stabiliser markets — Article 81(1) EC — Scope — Consultancy firm not operating on the relevant markets — Definition of ‘agreement between undertakings’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Calculation of the amount of fines — The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Case C-194/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2015 — AC Treuhand AG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European tin stabiliser and ESBO/esters heat stabiliser markets — Article 81(1) EC — Scope — Consultancy firm not operating on the relevant markets — Definition of ‘agreement between undertakings’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Calculation of the amount of fines — The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)
IO C 414, 14.12.2015, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.12.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 414/5 |
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2015 — AC Treuhand AG v European Commission
(Case C-194/14 P) (1)
((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European tin stabiliser and ESBO/esters heat stabiliser markets - Article 81(1) EC - Scope - Consultancy firm not operating on the relevant markets - Definition of ‘agreement between undertakings’ and ‘concerted practice’ - Calculation of the amount of fines - The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Unlimited jurisdiction))
(2015/C 414/06)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: AC Treuhand AG (represented by: C. Steinle, I. Bodenstein and C. von Köckritz, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Leupold, F. Ronkes Agerbeek and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal. |
|
2. |
Orders AC-Treuhand AG to pay the costs. |