This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CA0138
Case C-138/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich (Competition — Article 102 TFEU — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Data of the companies register stored in a database — Activity of collection and making available of that data in return for remuneration — Refusal by the public authorities to authorise re-utilisation of that data — ‘Sui generis’ right provided for in Article 7 of Directive 96/9/EC)
Case C-138/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich (Competition — Article 102 TFEU — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Data of the companies register stored in a database — Activity of collection and making available of that data in return for remuneration — Refusal by the public authorities to authorise re-utilisation of that data — ‘Sui generis’ right provided for in Article 7 of Directive 96/9/EC)
Case C-138/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich (Competition — Article 102 TFEU — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Data of the companies register stored in a database — Activity of collection and making available of that data in return for remuneration — Refusal by the public authorities to authorise re-utilisation of that data — ‘Sui generis’ right provided for in Article 7 of Directive 96/9/EC)
IO C 287, 22.9.2012, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
22.9.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 287/11 |
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich
(Case C-138/11) (1)
(Competition - Article 102 TFEU - Concept of ‘undertaking’ - Data of the companies register stored in a database - Activity of collection and making available of that data in return for remuneration - Refusal by the public authorities to authorise re-utilisation of that data - ‘Sui generis’ right provided for in Article 7 of Directive 96/9/EC)
2012/C 287/17
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberster Gerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Compass-Datenbank GmbH
Defendant: Republik Österreich
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 102 TFEU — National rules providing for payment to be made for consultation of the companies register (Firmenbuch) and prohibiting any other commercial use of that register — Concept of economic activity — Abuse of a dominant position — Scope of the essential facilities doctrine
Operative part of the judgment
The activity of a public authority consisting in the storing, in a database, of data which undertakings are obliged to report on the basis of statutory obligations, in permitting interested persons to search for that data and/or in providing them with print-outs thereof does not constitute an economic activity, and that public authority is not, therefore, to be regarded, in the course of that activity, as an undertaking, within the meaning of Article 102 TFEU. The fact that those searches and/or that provision of print-outs are carried out in consideration for remuneration provided for by law and not determined, directly or indirectly, by the entity concerned, is not such as to alter the legal classification of that activity. In addition, when such a public authority prohibits any other use of the data thus collected and made available to the public, by relying upon the sui generis protection granted to it as maker of the database pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, or upon any other intellectual property right, it also does not exercise an economic activity and is not therefore to be regarded, in the course of that activity, as an undertaking, within the meaning of Article 102 TFEU.