EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0479

Case T-479/08: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — adidas v OHIM — Patrick Holding (Representation of a shoe with two stripes) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a shoe with two stripes on the side — Earlier national trade mark representing a shoe with three stripes on the side — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to substantiate the earlier right — Failure to translate elements essential to substantiating the registration of the earlier trade mark — Rule 16(3), Rule 17(2) and Rule 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

IO C 331, 12.11.2011, p. 17–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

12.11.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/17


Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — adidas v OHIM — Patrick Holding (Representation of a shoe with two stripes)

(Case T-479/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark representing a shoe with two stripes on the side - Earlier national trade mark representing a shoe with three stripes on the side - Relative ground for refusal - Failure to substantiate the earlier right - Failure to translate elements essential to substantiating the registration of the earlier trade mark - Rule 16(3), Rule 17(2) and Rule 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

2011/C 331/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: adidas AG (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, and I. Fowler, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Patrick Holding ApS (Fredensborg, Denmark) (represented by: J. Løge and T. Meedom, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 August 2008 (Case R 849/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between adidas AG and Patrick Holding ApS.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders adidas AG to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.


Top