Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021CN0029

    Case C-29/21 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-574/19, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO

    IO C 252, 28.6.2021, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    18/01/2021
    Date lodged:
    18/01/2021
    Author:
    An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Béarla
    Type of procedure:
    Iarratas ar bhearta eatramhacha - neamh-inghlactha, Achomharc, Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Other parties to the proceedings:
    Oifig Maoine Intleachtúla an Aontais Eorpaigh
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    28.6.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 252/6

    Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-574/19, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO

    (Case C-29/21 P)

    (2021/C 252/09)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (represented by: A. Odle and R. Palijama, advocaten)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

    By order of 5 May 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tinnus Enterprises LLC should bear its own costs.

    Top