This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TN0248
Case T-248/19: Action brought on 12 April 2019 — Bilde v Parliament
Case T-248/19: Action brought on 12 April 2019 — Bilde v Parliament
Case T-248/19: Action brought on 12 April 2019 — Bilde v Parliament
IO C 213, 24.6.2019, p. 58–59
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 12/04/2019
- Date lodged:
- 12/04/2019
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Fraincis
- Type of procedure:
- Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
24.6.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 213/58 |
Action brought on 12 April 2019 — Bilde v Parliament
(Case T-248/19)
(2019/C 213/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Dominique Bilde (Lagarde, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the decision of the European Parliament P8_TA-PROV(2019)0137, of 12 March 2019, on the request for the waiver of the immunity of the applicant 2018/2267(IMM), and which actually waived the applicant’s immunity; |
|
— |
order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 9 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 266), of Article 5(1) and (5) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (OJ 2005 L 44, p. 1) and of the Communications to Members Nos 11/2003 and 22/2016. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging an abuse of process, more specifically, infringement of Article 43 of the Communication to Members No 11/2016, inasmuch as the underlying purpose of the charges is to damage the applicant’s political activity, which constitutes a case of fumus persecutionis against him. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the general principles of EU law ‘ne bis in idem’ and ‘electa una via’, an abuse of process and a misuse of powers. |
