Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0292

    Case T-292/18: Action brought on 7 May 2018 — Portugal v Commission

    IO C 249, 16.7.2018, p. 39–39 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    07/05/2018
    Date lodged:
    07/05/2018
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Portaingéilis
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link
    201806290701986592018/C 249/492922018TC24920180716EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180507393911

    Case T-292/18: Action brought on 7 May 2018 — Portugal v Commission

    Top

    C2492018EN3910120180507EN0049391391

    Action brought on 7 May 2018 — Portugal v Commission

    (Case T-292/18)

    2018/C 249/49Language of the case: Portuguese

    Parties

    Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, P. Estevão and J. Saraiva de Almeida, acting as Agents)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicants claim that the Court should:

    —

    annul Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 955 of 27 February 2018, excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it excludes from EU financing expenditure declared by Portugal in the sum of EUR 1052101,05 on the ground that it comes under ‘Debts wrongly reported in the Annex III tables, having escaped the application of the 50/50 rule’;

    —

    order the European Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on an infringement of Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 ( 1 ) and of Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 1306/2013. ( 2 )

    ( 1 ) Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (OJ 2005 L 209, p. 1).

    ( 2 ) Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549).

    Top