Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CA0654

    Case C-654/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 — Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v European Commission, Freistaat Sachsen (Appeal — State aid — Regional investment aid — Aid for a large investment project — Aid partly incompatible with the internal market — Article 107(3) TFEU — Whether the aid is necessary — Article 108(3) TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 — Aid exceeding the individual notification threshold — Notification — Scope of the block exemption — Cross-appeal — Whether an intervention before the General Court of the European Union may proceed — Admissibility)

    IO C 319, 23.9.2019, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.9.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 319/11


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 — Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v European Commission, Freistaat Sachsen

    (Case C-654/17 P) (1)

    (Appeal - State aid - Regional investment aid - Aid for a large investment project - Aid partly incompatible with the internal market - Article 107(3) TFEU - Whether the aid is necessary - Article 108(3) TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 - Aid exceeding the individual notification threshold - Notification - Scope of the block exemption - Cross-appeal - Whether an intervention before the General Court of the European Union may proceed - Admissibility)

    (2019/C 319/10)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Appellant: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (represented by: M. Rosenthal, G. Drauz and M. Schütte, Rechtsanwälte)

    Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, A. Bouchagiar and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents), Freistaat Sachsen (represented by: T. Lübbig, Rechtsanwalt)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal;

    2.

    Orders Bayerische Motoren Werke AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in respect of the main appeal;

    3.

    Orders Freistaat Sachsen to bear its own costs in respect of the main appeal;

    4.

    Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and of Freistaat Sachsen in respect of the cross-appeal.


    (1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.


    Top