Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62015TN0703

Case T-703/15: Action brought on 30 November 2015 — Groupe Go Sport v OHIM — Design Go (GO SPORT)

IO C 48, 8.2.2016, p. 86–87 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
30/11/2015
Date lodged:
30/11/2015
Author:
Cúirt Ghinearálta
Form:
Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
Authentic language:
Béarla
Type of procedure:
Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

8.2.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/86

Action brought on 30 November 2015 — Groupe Go Sport v OHIM — Design Go (GO SPORT)

(Case T-703/15)

(2016/C 048/95)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Groupe Go Sport (Sassenage, France) (represented by: G. Arbant and E. Henry-Mayer, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Design Go Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘GO SPORT’ — Community trade mark application No 5 144 811

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 September 2015 in Case R 569/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

declare admissible the Appeal R 569/2015-2;

—

return the case to the Board of Appeal;

—

order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the Applicant.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 60 of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 49(1) of Regulation No 2868/95.
Top