Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015TN0596

    Case T-596/15: Action brought on 19 October 2015 — Batmore Capital v. OHIM — Univers Poche (POCKETBOOK)

    IO C 414, 14.12.2015, p. 37–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    19/10/2015
    Date lodged:
    19/10/2015
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Béarla
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú

    14.12.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 414/37

    Action brought on 19 October 2015 — Batmore Capital v. OHIM — Univers Poche (POCKETBOOK)

    (Case T-596/15)

    (2015/C 414/48)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Batmore Capital Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: D. Masson, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Univers Poche (Paris, France)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word element ‘POCKETBOOK’ — Application for registration No 1 034 872

    Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 July 2015 in Case R 1952/2014-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    consider the present appeal admissible;

    —

    annul the contested decision in its entirety;

    —

    register the Community part of the International trademark registration No 1 034 872;

    —

    order OHIM to pay the fees and costs incurred by the applicant in the course of the present proceedings.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Wrong appreciation of the similarity of the products and services;

    —

    Wrong appreciation of the likelihood of confusion between the signs in conflict.
    Top