Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012FA0121

    Case F-121/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 25 June 2014  — Maynard v Europol (Civil service — Europol staff — Europol Convention — Europol Staff Regulations — Decision 2009/371/JHA — Application of the CEOS to members of the staff of Europol — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract as a member of the temporary staff — Refusal to grant a contract for an indefinite period as a member of the temporary staff)

    IO C 253, 4.8.2014, p. 69–69 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    4.8.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 253/69


    Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 25 June 2014 — Maynard v Europol

    (Case F-121/12) (1)

    ((Civil service - Europol staff - Europol Convention - Europol Staff Regulations - Decision 2009/371/JHA - Application of the CEOS to members of the staff of Europol - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract as a member of the temporary staff - Refusal to grant a contract for an indefinite period as a member of the temporary staff))

    2014/C 253/96

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Ginny Maynard (The Hague, the Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: initially, D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents, then J. Arnould, D. Neumann ad D. El Khoury, Agents)

    Re:

    Application to annul Europol’s decision not to renew the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period and an application to order Europol to pay the difference between the remuneration which she could have continued to receive at Europol and any other damages which she actually received.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Tribunal:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Ms Maynard to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office.


    (1)  OJ C 379, 8/12/2012, p. 36.


    Top