Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62010FN0045

Case F-45/10: Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Kaser/Commission

IO C 221, 14.8.2010, p. 60–61 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
11/06/2010
Date lodged:
11/06/2010
Author:
An Binse um Sheirbhís Shibhialta
Form:
Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
Authentic language:
Béarla

14.8.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/60

Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Kaser/Commission

(Case F-45/10)

()

2010/C 221/96

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ferdinand Kaser (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Schober, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

First, annulment of the Decision of the European Commission CMS 07/046 removing applicant from his post, without reduction of the pension rights, witch took effect on 15 August 2009 and the annulment of all decisions taken against the applicant in the period between September 2003 until the removing from the post and, second, a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:

—

Annul the Decision CMS 07/046 due to harassment, mismanagement and the abuse of the fundamental right to be heard;

—

annul all decisions taken by the Appointing Authority against the applicant between the period September 2003 until the removing from the post due to harassment and mismanagement due to the abuse of the right of the applicant to be heard;

—

enable a hearing of the applicant according to Article 7(1) and Article 24 of the Staff Regulations, and to refer to the submitted requests in February 2008 and March 2008;

—

grant a symbolic compensation of one (1) Euro to the applicant in order to compensate his moral and professional prejudice he suffered as exposed in the present complaint, as far as the objective of such a complaint is not money but recognition of dignity and professional reputation of the applicant.
Top