This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0471
Case T-471/22: Action brought on 29 July 2022 — QM v Council
Case T-471/22: Action brought on 29 July 2022 — QM v Council
Case T-471/22: Action brought on 29 July 2022 — QM v Council
OJ C 359, 19.9.2022, p. 92–93
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.9.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 359/92 |
Action brought on 29 July 2022 — QM v Council
(Case T-471/22)
(2022/C 359/112)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Parties
Applicant: QM (represented by: St. Koev, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
declare the action to be admissible and well founded in its entirety and declare all pleas in law set out therein to be well founded; |
— |
declare that the contested measures may be annulled in part; |
— |
annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/849 of 30 May 2022 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (1) in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
— |
annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/840 of 30 May 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (2) in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
— |
order the Council of the European Union to pay all the applicant’s legal costs, expenses, fees and other expenditure linked to his defence. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging material infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to a fair trial. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging failure on the part of the Council to fulfil its obligation to state reasons. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging an error of assessment on the part of the Council. |
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to property, of the principle of proportionality and of the freedom to conduct a business. |
6. |
Sixth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to a normal life. |
7. |
Seventh plea in law, alleging a serious infringement of the right to the protection of reputation. |