This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TB0540
Case T-540/21: Order of the General Court of 4 January 2022 — Vivostore v EUIPO — Linda (VIVO LIFE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-540/21: Order of the General Court of 4 January 2022 — Vivostore v EUIPO — Linda (VIVO LIFE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-540/21: Order of the General Court of 4 January 2022 — Vivostore v EUIPO — Linda (VIVO LIFE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 47–47
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 20–20
(GA)
|
14.3.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 119/47 |
Order of the General Court of 4 January 2022 — Vivostore v EUIPO — Linda (VIVO LIFE)
(Case T-540/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 119/66)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Vivostore Ltd (Winscombe, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. Urek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Linda AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: I. Jung, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 July 2021 (Case R 1587/2020-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Linda and Vivostore.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
Vivostore and Linda AG shall bear their own costs and each pay half of the costs of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |