This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0630
Case T-630/20: Judgment of the General Court of 12 January 2022 — MW v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Political group — Dismissal — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Psychological harassment — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Liability)
Case T-630/20: Judgment of the General Court of 12 January 2022 — MW v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Political group — Dismissal — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Psychological harassment — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Liability)
Case T-630/20: Judgment of the General Court of 12 January 2022 — MW v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Political group — Dismissal — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Psychological harassment — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Liability)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 15–15
(GA)
14.3.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 119/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 January 2022 — MW v Parliament
(Case T-630/20) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Political group - Dismissal - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Psychological harassment - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Liability)
(2022/C 119/48)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: MW (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: I. Lázaro Betancor and N. Scafarto, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, the annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 11 December 2019 to terminate the contract of employment of the applicant as a member of the temporary staff under Article 2(c) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union and, second, compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders MW to pay the costs. |