This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TN0821
Case T-821/19: Action brought on 2 December 2019 — Herlyn and Beck v EUIPO — Brillux (B.home)
Case T-821/19: Action brought on 2 December 2019 — Herlyn and Beck v EUIPO — Brillux (B.home)
Case T-821/19: Action brought on 2 December 2019 — Herlyn and Beck v EUIPO — Brillux (B.home)
OJ C 27, 27.1.2020, p. 70–71
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.1.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 27/70 |
Action brought on 2 December 2019 — Herlyn and Beck v EUIPO — Brillux (B.home)
(Case T-821/19)
(2020/C 27/71)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicants: Sonja Herlyn (Grünwald, Germany), Christian Beck (Grünwald) (represented by: H. Hofmann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Brillux GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicants
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU trade mark B.home — Application for registration No 16 961 336
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 September 2019 in Case R 373/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
annul or amend the contested decision and uphold the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in proceedings B2976549 of 10 December 2018; |
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs; |
— |
set a date for an oral hearing. |
Plea in law
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |