Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0751

Case T-751/17: Action brought on 17 November 2017 — Commune de Fessenheim and Others v Commission

OJ C 32, 29.1.2018, p. 36–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

29.1.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/36

Action brought on 17 November 2017 — Commune de Fessenheim and Others v Commission

(Case T-751/17)

(2018/C 032/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Commune de Fessenheim (Fessenheim, France), Communauté de communes Pays Rhin-Brisach (Volgelsheim, France), Conseil départemental du Haut-Rhin (Colmar, France) et Conseil régional Grand Est Alsace Champagne-Ardenne Lorraine (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: G. de Rubercy, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

—

Annul Decision (C(2017 7119 FINAL) of the Secretarial-General of the European Commission dated 18 October 2017 by which communication of the decision of the European Commission Directorate-General for Competition notified to the French authorities on 22 March 2017, concerning the protocol for indemnifying EDF in respect of the closure of the nuclear power plant of Fessenheim was refused;

—

Order the European Commission to communicate that letter of 22 March 2017 to the applicants within one week from the judgment to be delivered by the General Court;

—

Order the European Commission to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the final subparagraph of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), since there is an overriding public interest justifying disclosure of the information at issue.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union concerning the right of access to documents.

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union concerning the right to an effective remedy.
Top