EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0234
Case T-234/17: Action brought on 19 April 2017 — Siberian Vodka v EUIPO — Friedr. Schwarze (DIAMOND ICE)
Case T-234/17: Action brought on 19 April 2017 — Siberian Vodka v EUIPO — Friedr. Schwarze (DIAMOND ICE)
Case T-234/17: Action brought on 19 April 2017 — Siberian Vodka v EUIPO — Friedr. Schwarze (DIAMOND ICE)
OJ C 195, 19.6.2017, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.6.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 195/38 |
Action brought on 19 April 2017 — Siberian Vodka v EUIPO — Friedr. Schwarze (DIAMOND ICE)
(Case T-234/17)
(2017/C 195/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Siberian Vodka AG (Herisau, Switzerland) (represented by: O. Bischof, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Friedr. Schwarze GmbH & Co. KG (Oelde, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘DIAMOND ICE’ — International registration No 1 211 695
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 February 2017 in Case R 1171/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 February 2017 in the appeal proceedings R 1171/2016-4; |
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |