EUR-Lex Acces la dreptul Uniunii Europene
Acest document este un extras de pe site-ul EUR-Lex
Document 62016TN0233
Case T-233/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2016 by José Luis Ruiz Molina against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 March 2016 in Case F-60/15, Ruiz Molina v OHIM
Case T-233/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2016 by José Luis Ruiz Molina against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 March 2016 in Case F-60/15, Ruiz Molina v OHIM
Case T-233/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2016 by José Luis Ruiz Molina against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 March 2016 in Case F-60/15, Ruiz Molina v OHIM
OJ C 243, 4.7.2016, p. 45-45
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.7.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 243/45 |
Appeal brought on 12 May 2016 by José Luis Ruiz Molina against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 March 2016 in Case F-60/15, Ruiz Molina v OHIM
(Case T-233/16 P)
(2016/C 243/50)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: José Luis Ruiz Molina (San Juan de Alicante, Spain) (represented by: N. Lhoëst and S. Michiels, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Form of order sought by the appellant
The appellant claims that the Court should
|
— |
set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 2 March 2016 in Case F-60/15; |
|
— |
order the respondent to the appeal to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings in their entirety. |
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on four grounds of appeal.
|
1. |
First ground of appeal, alleging infringement of the first paragraph of Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union. |
|
2. |
Second ground of appeal, alleging infringement of the principle of res judicata attaching to the judgment of 15 September 2011 in Bennett and Others v OHIM, F-102/09, EU:F:2011:138. |
|
3. |
Third ground of appeal, alleging infringement of Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43) which implemented the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded on 18 March 1999 between the general cross-industry organisations, and infringement of well established principles and standards of international social and labour law on stable employment. |
|
4. |
Fourth ground of appeal, alleging failure to state reasons for the judgment under appeal. |