Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014TN0728

    Case T-728/14: Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition v OHIM — H. Young Holdings (animal)

    OJ C 431, 1.12.2014, p. 44–45 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.12.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 431/44

    Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition v OHIM — H. Young Holdings (animal)

    (Case T-728/14)

    (2014/C 431/69)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition (New Brunswick, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H. Young Holdings plc (Newbury, United Kingdom)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘animal’ — Community trade mark No 2 8 24  548

    Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 July 2014 in Case R 2058/2013-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement of Article 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95.
    Top