This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TA0561
Case T-561/12: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2013 — Beninca v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Document drawn up by the Commission in the context of the merger between Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process)
Case T-561/12: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2013 — Beninca v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Document drawn up by the Commission in the context of the merger between Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process)
Case T-561/12: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2013 — Beninca v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Document drawn up by the Commission in the context of the merger between Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process)
OJ C 359, 7.12.2013, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.12.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 359/11 |
Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2013 — Beninca v Commission
(Case T-561/12) (1)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Document drawn up by the Commission in the context of the merger between Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process)
2013/C 359/18
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Jürgen Beninca (Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Zschocke, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 9 October 2012 refusing access to a memorandum from the head of the unit responsible for competition matters at the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
|
2. |
Orders Mr. Jürgen Beninca to pay the costs. |