EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0102

Case T-102/08 P: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 October 2009 — Sundholm v Commission (Appeal — Staff case — Officials — Reports — Career development report drawn up in compliance with a judgment of the Tribunal — Appraisal year 2001/2002 — Justified absences — Obligation to state reasons)

OJ C 282, 21.11.2009, p. 43–44 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

21.11.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/43


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 October 2009 — Sundholm v Commission

(Case T-102/08 P) (1)

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Reports - Career development report drawn up in compliance with a judgment of the Tribunal - Appraisal year 2001/2002 - Justified absences - Obligation to state reasons)

2009/C 282/82

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Asa Sundholm (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 in Case F-27/07 Sundholm v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 in Case F-27/07 Sundholm v Commission, not published in the ECR;

2.

Annuls the decision of 2 June 2006 by which the reporting officer on appeal established Ms Asa Sundholm's career development report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002;

3.

For the rest, dismisses the action brought at first instance;

4.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs of the procedure before the Civil Service Tribunal and of the present instance.


(1)  OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.


Top