This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32007E0468
Council Joint Action 2007/468/CFSP of 28 June 2007 on support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to strengthen its monitoring and verification capabilities and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
Council Joint Action 2007/468/CFSP of 28 June 2007 on support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to strengthen its monitoring and verification capabilities and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
Council Joint Action 2007/468/CFSP of 28 June 2007 on support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to strengthen its monitoring and verification capabilities and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
OJ L 176, 6.7.2007, p. 31–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
In force
6.7.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 176/31 |
COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2007/468/CFSP
of 28 June 2007
on support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to strengthen its monitoring and verification capabilities and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 14 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
On 12 December 2003, the European Council adopted the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Chapter III of which contains a list of measures to combat such proliferation which need to be taken both within the EU and in third countries. |
(2) |
The European Union is actively implementing the EU Strategy and is giving effect to the measures listed in Chapter III thereof, in particular by releasing financial resources to support specific projects conducted by multilateral institutions. |
(3) |
The States Signatories to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10 September 1996, have decided to establish a Preparatory Commission, endowed with legal capacity, for the purpose of carrying out the effective implementation of the CTBT, pending the establishment of the CTBT Organisation (CTBTO). |
(4) |
On 17 November 2003, the Council adopted Common Position 2003/805/CFSP (1) on the universalisation and reinforcement of multilateral agreements in the field of non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and means of delivery. |
(5) |
The early entry into force and universalisation of the CTBT and the strengthening of the monitoring and verification system of the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO are important objectives of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. |
(6) |
The Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO pursues the same objectives as those referred to in recitals 4 and 5 and is already engaged in identifying by what means its verification system could best be strengthened through the timely provision of expertise and training to personnel from the States Signatories involved in the implementation of the verification regime. It is therefore appropriate to entrust the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO with the technical implementation of this Joint Action. |
(7) |
On 20 March 2006, the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/243/CFSP (2) on support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in the area of training and capacity building for verification and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. |
(8) |
The nuclear test carried out by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea in October 2006 further underlined the importance of the early entry into force of the CTBT and the need for an accelerated building-up of the CTBTO monitoring and verification system, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:
Article 1
1. For the purposes of immediate and practical implementation of certain elements of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, the European Union shall support the activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to further the following objectives:
(a) |
strengthening the capabilities of the CTBTO monitoring and verification system, including in the field of radio-nuclide detection; |
(b) |
enhancing the operational performance of the CTBTO monitoring and verification system, including through testing and validation of on-site inspection modalities. |
2. The projects to be supported by the European Union shall have the following specific objectives:
(a) |
to provide support for the development of capacity in the area of noble gas monitoring and verification; |
(b) |
to provide support for the preparation, conduct and evaluation of the Integrated Field Exercise 2008 in the area of on-site inspections (IFE08/OSI). |
The projects shall be carried out for the benefit of all States Signatories to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.
A detailed description of the projects is set out in the Annex.
Article 2
1. The Presidency, assisted by the Secretary-General of the Council/High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (SG/HR), shall be responsible for the implementation of this Joint Action. The Commission shall be fully associated.
2. The projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be carried out by the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO. It shall perform this task under the control of the SG/HR, assisting the Presidency. For this purpose, the SG/HR shall enter into the necessary arrangements with the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO.
3. The Presidency, the SG/HR and the Commission shall keep each other regularly informed about the projects, in conformity with their respective competences.
Article 3
1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be EUR 1 670 000.
2. The expenditure financed by the amount stipulated in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the European Community procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the European Communities with the exception that any pre-financing shall not remain the property of the Community.
3. The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the expenditure referred to in paragraph 2. For this purpose, it shall conclude a financing agreement with the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO, which shall take the form of a grant. The financing agreement shall stipulate that the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO is to ensure visibility of the EU contribution, appropriate to its size.
4. The Commission shall endeavour to conclude the financing agreement referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Joint Action. It shall inform the Council of any difficulties in that process and of the date of conclusion of the financing agreement.
Article 4
The Presidency, assisted by the SG/HR, shall report to the Council on the implementation of this Joint Action on the basis of regular reports prepared by the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO. These reports shall form the basis for the evaluation by the Council. The Commission shall be fully associated. It shall provide information on the financial aspects of the implementation of this Joint Action.
Article 5
This Joint Action shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.
It shall expire:
(a) |
15 months after the conclusion of the financing agreement between the Commission and the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO, or |
(b) |
12 months after the date of its adoption if no financing agreement has been concluded within that period. |
Article 6
This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Luxembourg, 28 June 2007.
For the Council
The President
S. GABRIEL
ANNEX
EU support for activities of the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) in order to strengthen its monitoring and verification capabilities and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
I. Introduction
The announced nuclear tests by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) in October 2006 not only highlighted the importance of early entry into force of the Treaty, but also underscored the need for the rapid build-up of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) verification regime. The event constituted a real life system-wide test for the Provisional Technical Secretariat (PTS) and highlighted the potential value that the global verification system can bring to States Signatories. It demonstrated the technical relevance or the CTBT verification arrangements, including the importance of validated and efficient on-site inspections (OSI). For this project proposal, the PTS has identified elements with regard to the monitoring and verification capabilities that merit particular focus in the light of the experiences gained from the DPRK event. The proposal is built on the following two components:
(a) |
noble gases; |
(b) |
the Integrated Field Exercise 2008 (IFE08/OSI). |
II. Description of projects
1. Project Component Noble Gas; improve the knowledge of PTS noble gas measurements:
(a) |
the International Monitoring System (IMS) has currently reached a level of approximately two-thirds of stations in operation. The build-up of the system is pursued as a matter of priority with the aim to reach a level of up to 90 % in early 2008. The DPRK event was well recorded by the PTS primary and auxiliary seismic stations, providing reliable measurements to States Signatories of the time, location and magnitude of the event. The system of seismic stations has reached a level of approximately 80 % build up to date; |
(b) |
the level of operation of stations capable of monitoring the presence in the atmosphere of relevant noble gases upon the entry into force of the Treaty, however, needs to be advanced. Currently, 10 prototype stations are operational or in construction, equivalent to 25 % of the projected number at entry into force. These stations are providing experimental and provisional measurements in the framework of the PTS's International Noble Gas Experiment (INGE). It is recalled that this research and development program is based on four technologies proposed by the four following countries: France, Russia, Sweden and the United States. In the wake of the DPRK event, many States Signatories, including Member States of the European Union, have expressed their opinion that the PTS capabilities of monitoring the presence of noble gas need to be strengthened; |
(c) |
noble gas monitoring is a fundamental and highly sensitive technique for the detection of underground and underwater nuclear explosions. Of all verification technologies, it is, together with radionuclide particulate monitoring, the only technique that has the potential to provide unmistakable proof of a nuclear explosion; |
(d) |
in order to ensure the quality and accuracy of the current and future PTS's noble gas measurement capabilities, it is of eminent importance to know the ‘noble gas background’ that can be expected in other regions of the world, where no stations currently exist. A methodology for categorization of events detected by noble gas system measurements therefore needs to be developed. Noble gas field measurements are the best way to achieve this and to provide answers to such ‘unknowns’. Currently, INGE stations are collecting data in the North- and South Americas, Europe, Asia and Oceania. However, in South Asia, the Persian Gulf and Southern Africa, there are nuclear facilities but no radio xenon background data are available. Moreover, in Europe measurements at specific sites, e.g. near radiopharmaceutical plants or nuclear power plants, are also needed; |
(e) |
to this end, measurements near nuclear power plants (NPPs) or radiopharmaceutical production plants should be undertaken to show the difference between theoretical release models, reported average releases, and experimental, real measured results. Further, the background of noble gases in other regions of the world, where no stations currently exist, needs to be studied; |
(f) |
to achieve the abovementioned necessary improvements of the capabilities in the area of noble gas, the PTS seeks support for the following project:
|
(g) |
measurements are planned to be performed in the following regions: Europe (1), the Persian Gulf (2), Southern Africa (3) and South Asia (4). The measurements in region (3) and partly in region (1) are expected to be performed with CEA (France) equipment, while the measurements in region (2) and (4) as well as partly in (1) are expected to be performed with FOI (Sweden) equipment; |
(h) |
the equipment for this project will be provided free of charge by CEA (France) and FOI (Sweden) who will also be contracted by the PTS for its deployment and operation; |
(i) |
the expected duration of this project component would be approximately one to one and a half years; |
(j) |
preliminary cost estimated: EUR 960 507. |
2. project Component On-Site Inspection; Support for the Preparations for the Integrated Field Exercise 2008
(a) |
the event in the DPRK has again highlighted the importance of on-site inspections as a key pillar of the CTBT verification regime. While the data provided by the International Monitoring System and the International Data Centre about the event in the DPRK in the framework of provisional operating and testing of the system was extremely valuable and reliable, definite clarity about the nature of the event could only be obtained through an on-site inspection in the determined location. It is a key responsibility of the Preparatory Commission to achieve the highest level of operational readiness of the on-site inspection regime in time for entry into force of the Treaty; |
(b) |
policy making organs of the Preparatory Commission, in particular Working Group B, have underscored repeatedly that the most efficient way of achieving the required level of readiness is through the conduct of OSI field exercises. The first such large-scale exercise, the Integrated Field Exercise 2008 (IFE08), will take place in September 2008 in Kazakhstan. This will be the first attempt to simulate a real on site inspection by integrating three main pillars of the OSI regime, namely:
|
(c) |
the comprehensive preparations and successful conduct of IFE08 are a prerequisite for the completion of the OSI regime in the near future. The evaluation of the results and the lessons learned from IFE08 will provide the PTS with essential knowledge as to which steps still need to be taken to achieve operational readiness of the OSI regime. The availability of appropriate resources for IFE08, financial and human, as well as in-kind contributions by States Signatories of equipment, training and logistical support is essential for the success of IFE08; |
(d) |
in the current stage of preparations for IFE08, the PTS has identified the following areas in which support from States Signatories would be particularly important:
|
(e) |
The estimated costs for the two components in support of IFE08 are:
|
III. Duration
The total estimated duration of the implementation of the projects is 15 months.
IV. Beneficiaries
The beneficiaries of the projects in this Joint Action, which are aimed at strengthening the monitoring and verification capabilities of the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO, are all States Signatories to the CTBT.
V. Implementing entity
The CTBTO Preparatory Commission will be entrusted with the implementation of the projects. The projects will be implemented directly by staff of the Provisional Technical Secretariat of the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO, experts from the States Signatories to the CTBT and contractors. In the case of contractors, the procurement of any goods, works or services by the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO in the context of this Joint Action will be carried out as detailed in the financing agreement to be concluded by the European Commission with the Preparatory Commission of the CTBTO.
The implementing entity will prepare:
(a) |
A mid-term report after the first six months of the implementation of the projects; |
(b) |
A final report not later than one month after the end of the implementation of the projects. |
Reports will be sent to the Presidency, assisted by the SG/HR for the Common Foreign and Security Policy.
VI. Third party participants
The projects will be financed in their entirety by this Joint Action. Experts from the CTBTO Preparatory Commission and from the States Signatories to the CTBT may be considered as third party participants. They will work under the standard rules of operation for CTBTO Preparatory Commission experts.
VII. Estimated required total financial means
The EU contribution will cover full implementation of the project described in this Annex. The estimated costs are as follows:
Project Component Noble Gas: |
EUR 960 507 |
Project Component On-Site Inspection: |
EUR 672 214 |
Total: |
EUR 1 632 721 |
In addition, a contingency reserve of about 3 % of eligible costs (for a total amount of EUR 37 279) is included for unforeseen costs.
VIII. Financial reference amount to cover the cost of the projects
The total cost of the project is EUR 1 670 000.