This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0586
Case T-586/20: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — MN v Europol (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract for an indefinite period — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-586/20: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — MN v Europol (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract for an indefinite period — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-586/20: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — MN v Europol (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract for an indefinite period — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 15–15
(GA)
- Date of document:
- 26/01/2022
- Date lodged:
- 24/09/2020
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Action for damages, Staff cases - unfounded
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62020TJ0586
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
14.3.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 119/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — MN v Europol
(Case T-586/20) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract for an indefinite period - Manifest error of assessment)
(2022/C 119/47)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: MN (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (represented by: A. Nunzi, O. Sajin and C. Falmagne, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, the annulment of Europol’s decision of 6 March 2020 not to renew the applicant’s employment contract for an indefinite period and, second, compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders MN to pay the costs. |
