Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TA0352

    Case T-352/20: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Elephant (Strong like nature) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Strong like nature — Earlier EU figurative mark STRONG NATURE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    OJ C 502, 13.12.2021, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.12.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 502/24


    Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Elephant (Strong like nature)

    (Case T-352/20) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Strong like nature - Earlier EU figurative mark STRONG NATURE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    (2021/C 502/36)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH (Dielheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Preduzeće za proizvodnju, unutrašnju i spoljnu trgovinu Elephant Co. d.o.o. (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: D. Cañadas Arcas, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2020 (Case R 1909/2019-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Preduzeće za proizvodnju, unutrašnju i spoljnu trgovinu Elephant and St. Hippolyt Holding.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.


    Top