This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CB0521
Case C-521/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — J.P. v B.d.S.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/62/EC — Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures — Tolls — Non-payment — Penalties — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Ne bis in idem principle — Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient information — No link between the interpretation of EU law sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-521/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — J.P. v B.d.S.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/62/EC — Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures — Tolls — Non-payment — Penalties — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Ne bis in idem principle — Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient information — No link between the interpretation of EU law sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-521/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — J.P. v B.d.S.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/62/EC — Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures — Tolls — Non-payment — Penalties — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Ne bis in idem principle — Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient information — No link between the interpretation of EU law sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 359, 19.9.2022, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 07/04/2022
- Date lodged:
- 19/10/2020
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling - inadmissible
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62020CO0521
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
19.9.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 359/13 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — J.P. v B.d.S.L.
(Case C-521/20) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 1999/62/EC - Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Tolls - Non-payment - Penalties - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 50 - Ne bis in idem principle - Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure - Lack of sufficient information - No link between the interpretation of EU law sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 359/16)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich
Parties to the main proceedings
Complainant: J.P.
Defendant authority: B.d.S.L.
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Regional Administrative Court, Upper Austria, Austria), by decision of 15 October 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.
