Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TA0789

    Case T-789/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — TecAlliance v EUIPO — Siemens (TecDocPower) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark TecDocPower — Earlier EU word and figurative marks TECDOC and TecDoc — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of earlier marks — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

    OJ C 103, 18.3.2019, p. 36–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    18.3.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 103/36


    Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — TecAlliance v EUIPO — Siemens (TecDocPower)

    (Case T-789/17) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark TecDocPower - Earlier EU word and figurative marks TECDOC and TecDoc - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Genuine use of earlier marks - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

    (2019/C 103/47)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: TecAlliance GmbH (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by P. Engemann, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Siemens AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2017 (Case R 2433/2016-1) relating to opposition proceedings between TecAlliance and Siemens

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders TecAlliance GmbH to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.


    Top