This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CB0259
Case C-259/17: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — Zoltán Rózsavölgyi, Zoltánné Rózsavölgyi v Unicredit Leasing Hungary Zrt., Unicredit Leasing Immo Truck Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Loan contract denominated in a foreign currency — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-259/17: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — Zoltán Rózsavölgyi, Zoltánné Rózsavölgyi v Unicredit Leasing Hungary Zrt., Unicredit Leasing Immo Truck Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Loan contract denominated in a foreign currency — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-259/17: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — Zoltán Rózsavölgyi, Zoltánné Rózsavölgyi v Unicredit Leasing Hungary Zrt., Unicredit Leasing Immo Truck Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Loan contract denominated in a foreign currency — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 32, 29.1.2018, p. 9–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 21/11/2017
- Date lodged:
- 16/05/2017
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Hungarian
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62017CO0259
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
29.1.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 32/9 |
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — Zoltán Rózsavölgyi, Zoltánné Rózsavölgyi v Unicredit Leasing Hungary Zrt., Unicredit Leasing Immo Truck Zrt.
(Case C-259/17) (1)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Consumer protection - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Loan contract denominated in a foreign currency - Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2018/C 032/13)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Zoltán Rózsavölgyi, Zoltánné Rózsavölgyi
Defendants: Unicredit Leasing Hungary Zrt., Unicredit Leasing Immo Truck Zrt.
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság (Central District Court, Buda, Hungary), by decision of 31 March 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.
