This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0125
Case T-125/16: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2017 — Léon Van Parys v Commission (Customs union — Imports of bananas from Equador — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for the remission of import duties — Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Reasonable time)
Case T-125/16: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2017 — Léon Van Parys v Commission (Customs union — Imports of bananas from Equador — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for the remission of import duties — Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Reasonable time)
Case T-125/16: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2017 — Léon Van Parys v Commission (Customs union — Imports of bananas from Equador — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for the remission of import duties — Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Reasonable time)
OJ C 32, 29.1.2018, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 11/12/2017
- Date lodged:
- 23/03/2016
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Dutch
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded, Action for annulment - successful
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62016TJ0125
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
29.1.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 32/26 |
Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2017 — Léon Van Parys v Commission
(Case T-125/16) (1)
((Customs union - Imports of bananas from Equador - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Application for the remission of import duties - Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision - Reasonable time))
(2018/C 032/34)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Firma Léon Van Parys NV (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: P. Vlaemminck, B. Van Vooren, R. Verbeke and J. Auwerx, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros, B.-R. Killmann and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application, first, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 95 final of 20 January 2016 finding that post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties is justified and that remission of those duties is justified with regard to a debtor and is in part justified in the particular case of another debtor but in another part not justified with regard to that particular debtor, and modifying Commission Decision C(2010) 2858 of 6 May 2010, and, second, for a declaration that Article 909 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) had effect with regard to the applicant following the judgment of 19 March 2013, Firma Van Parys v Commission (T-324/10, EU:T:2013:136).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls Article 1(4) of Commission Decision C(2016) 95 final of 20 January 2016 finding that post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties is justified and that remission of those duties is justified with regard to a debtor and is in part justified in the particular case of another debtor but in another part not justified with regard to that particular debtor, and modifying Commission Decision C(2010) 2858 of 6 May 2010; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Firma Léon Van Parys NV. |
