This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015FB0024
Case F-24/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Di Marzio v Council (Civil service — Contractual agent — Function group I — Reclassification of a contract into a contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite term at Grade AST 3, AST 4 or AST 5 or into a contract as a member of the contract staff for an indefinite term in function group III — Articles 2, 3a, 3b, 80 and 88 of the Conditions of Employment of other servants — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)
Case F-24/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Di Marzio v Council (Civil service — Contractual agent — Function group I — Reclassification of a contract into a contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite term at Grade AST 3, AST 4 or AST 5 or into a contract as a member of the contract staff for an indefinite term in function group III — Articles 2, 3a, 3b, 80 and 88 of the Conditions of Employment of other servants — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)
Case F-24/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Di Marzio v Council (Civil service — Contractual agent — Function group I — Reclassification of a contract into a contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite term at Grade AST 3, AST 4 or AST 5 or into a contract as a member of the contract staff for an indefinite term in function group III — Articles 2, 3a, 3b, 80 and 88 of the Conditions of Employment of other servants — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)
OJ C 48, 8.2.2016, p. 100–101
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 17/12/2015
- Date lodged:
- 11/02/2015
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Action for damages - unfounded, Staff cases - unfounded
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62015FO0024
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
8.2.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 48/100 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Di Marzio v Council
(Case F-24/15) (1)
((Civil service - Contractual agent - Function group I - Reclassification of a contract into a contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite term at Grade AST 3, AST 4 or AST 5 or into a contract as a member of the contract staff for an indefinite term in function group III - Articles 2, 3a, 3b, 80 and 88 of the Conditions of Employment of other servants - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of sound administration - Duty of care - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))
(2016/C 048/116)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Antony Di Marzio (Limelette, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for reclassification of his contract as a member of the contract staff in function group I into a contract as a member of the temporary staff or, alternatively, into a contract as a member of the contract staff in function group III, and the claim for compensation for the non-material and material damage allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
Mr Di Marzio shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
(1) OJ C 127 of 20/4/2015, p. 43.
