Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2015:414:TOC

    Official Journal of the European Union, C 414, 14 December 2015


    Display all documents published in this Official Journal
     

    ISSN 1977-091X

    Official Journal

    of the European Union

    C 414

    European flag  

    English edition

    Information and Notices

    Volume 58
    14 December 2015


    Notice No

    Contents

    page

     

    IV   Notices

     

    NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

     

    Court of Justice of the European Union

    2015/C 414/1

    Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

    1


     

    V   Announcements

     

    COURT PROCEEDINGS

     

    Court of Justice

    2015/C 414/2

    Case C-552/13: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 6 de Bilbao — Spain) — Grupo Hospitalario Quirón SA v Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco, Instituto de Religiosas Siervas de Jesús de la Caridad (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public service contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 23(2) — Management of public health services — Provision of health services under the remit of public hospitals in private establishments — Requirement that the services be provided in a particular municipality)

    2

    2015/C 414/3

    Case C-20/14: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht — Germany) — BGW Beratungs-Gesellschaft Wirtschaft mbH, formerly BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Further grounds for refusal or invalidity — Word mark — Same letter sequence as an earlier trade mark — Addition of a descriptive word combination — Existence of a likelihood of confusion)

    3

    2015/C 414/4

    Case C-126/14: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Sveda’ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 168 — Right of deduction — Deduction of input VAT on the acquisition or production of capital goods — Recreational path directly intended for use by the public free of charge — Use of the recreational path as a means of carrying out taxed transactions)

    3

    2015/C 414/5

    Case C-185/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘EasyPay’ AD, ‘Finance Engineering’ AD v Ministerski savet na Republika Bulgaria, Natsionalen osiguritelen institut (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Money order service — Directive 97/67/EC — Scope — National legislation granting an exclusive right to provide a money order service — State aid — Economic activity — Services of general economic interest)

    4

    2015/C 414/6

    Case C-194/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2015 — AC Treuhand AG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European tin stabiliser and ESBO/esters heat stabiliser markets — Article 81(1) EC — Scope — Consultancy firm not operating on the relevant markets — Definition of ‘agreement between undertakings’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Calculation of the amount of fines — The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)

    5

    2015/C 414/7

    Case C-245/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Thomas Cook Belgium NV v Thurner Hotel GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 — European order for payment procedure — Late statement of opposition — Article 20(2) — Application for review of the European order for payment — Objection to the jurisdiction of the court of origin — European order for payment wrongly issued having regard to the requirements laid down in the regulation — Not ‘clearly’ wrongly issued — No ‘exceptional’ circumstances)

    5

    2015/C 414/8

    Case C-264/14: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v David Hedqvist (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 2(1)(c) and 135(1)(d) to (f) — Services for consideration — Transactions to exchange the ‘bitcoin’ virtual currency for traditional currencies — Exemption)

    6

    2015/C 414/9

    Case C-277/14: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — PPUH Stehcemp sp. j. Florian Stefanek, Janina Stefanek, Jarosław Stefanek v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Łodzi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax — Sixth Directive — Right of deduction — Refusal — Sale by an entity regarded as non-existent)

    7

    2015/C 414/10

    Case C-347/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — New Media Online GmbH v Bundeskommunikationssenat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2010/13/EU — Concepts of ‘programme’ and ‘audiovisual media service’ — Determination of the principal purpose of an audiovisual media service — Comparability of the service to television broadcasting — Inclusion of short videos in a section of a newspaper’s website available on the Internet)

    7

    2015/C 414/11

    Case C-378/14: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Bundesagentur für Arbeit — Familienkasse Sachsen v Tomislaw Trapkowski (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 67 — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Article 60(1) — Payment of family benefits where parents are divorced — Definition of the ‘person concerned’ — Law of a Member State providing for the payment of family benefits to the parent who has taken the child into his household — Residence of that parent in another Member State — Failure of that parent to claim family benefits — Possibility of entitlement of the other parent to claim those family benefits)

    8

    2015/C 414/12

    Case C-425/14: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione Siciliana — Italy) — Impresa Edilux Srl, as the representative of a temporary joint venture, Società Italiana Costruzioni e Forniture Srl (SICEF) v Assessorato Beni Culturali e Identità Siciliana — Servizio Soprintendenza Provincia di Trapani, Assessorato ai Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana, UREGA — Sezione provinciale di Trapani, Assessorato delle Infrastrutture e della Mobilità della Regione Siciliana (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2004/18/EC — Grounds for exclusion from participation in a tendering procedure — Contract falling below the threshold of application of that directive — Fundamental rules of the FEU Treaty — Declaration of acceptance of a legality protocol on combating criminal activity — Exclusion for failure to lodge such a declaration — Whether permissible — Proportionality)

    9

    2015/C 414/13

    Case C-523/14: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Gelderland — Netherlands) — Aannemingsbedrijf Aertssen NV, Aertssen Terrassements SA v VSB Machineverhuur BV, Van Sommeren Bestrating BV, Jos van Sommeren (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 1 — Scope — Complaint seeking to join a civil action to proceedings — Article 27 — Lis pendens — Proceedings brought before a court of another Member State — Ongoing judicial investigation — Article 30 — Time when a court is deemed to be seised)

    10

    2015/C 414/14

    Case C-215/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — Vasilka Ivanova Gogova v Ilia Dimitrov Iliev (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Scope — Article 1(1)(b) — Attribution, exercise, delegation, restriction or termination of parental responsibility — Article 2 — Concept of parental responsibility — Dispute between parents on travel by their child and the issue of a passport to the child — Prorogation of jurisdiction — Article 12 — Conditions — Acceptance of the jurisdiction of the courts seised — Non-appearance of the defendant — Jurisdiction not contested by the defendant’s legal representative appointed by the courts seised of their own motion)

    11

    2015/C 414/15

    Case C-315/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 6 (Czech Republic) lodged on 26 June 2015 — Marcela Pešková, Jiří Peška v Travel Service a.s.

    12

    2015/C 414/16

    Case C-363/15 P: Appeal brought on 13 July 2015 by Louis Vuitton Malletier against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 21 April 2015 in Case T-359/12: Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG

    13

    2015/C 414/17

    Case C-364/15 P: Appeal brought on 13 July 2015 by Louis Vuitton Malletier against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 21 April 2015 in Case T-360/12: Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG

    14

    2015/C 414/18

    Case C-442/15 P: Appeal brought on 12 August 2015 by Pensa Pharma, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 June 2015 in Case T-544/12: Pensa Pharma, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Ferring BV, Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring A/S

    15

    2015/C 414/19

    Case C-485/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 11 September 2015 — Aeroporto Valerio Catullo di Verona Villafranca SpA v Società per l’Aeroporto Civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA)

    16

    2015/C 414/20

    Case C-494/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 21 September 2015 — Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC and Others v DELTA CENTER a.s.

    17

    2015/C 414/21

    Case C-499/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas lodged on 22 September 2015 — W. and V. v X.

    17

    2015/C 414/22

    Case C-501/15 P: Appeal brought on 22 September 2015 by Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 15 July 2015 in Case T-24/13: Cactus S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    18

    2015/C 414/23

    Case C-503/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Secretario Judicial of the Juzgado de Violencia sobre la Mujer de Terrassa (Spain) lodged on 23 September 2015 — Ramón Margarit Panicello v Pilar Hernández Martínez

    19

    2015/C 414/24

    Case C-507/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van Koophandel te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 24 September 2015 — Agro Foreign Trade & Agency Ltd v Petersime NV

    20

    2015/C 414/25

    Case C-513/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas lodged on 25 September 2015 in the administrative proceedings for review of legality between Agrodetalė UAB and Lietuvos Respublikos žemės ūkio ministerija

    20

    2015/C 414/26

    Case C-518/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the cour du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 28 September 2015 — Ville de Nivelles v Rudy Matzak

    21

    2015/C 414/27

    Case C-524/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo (Italy) lodged on 1 October 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Luca Menci

    22

    2015/C 414/28

    Case C-525/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Álava (Spain) lodged on 5 October 2015 — Laboral Kutxa v Esmeralda Martínez Quesada

    22

    2015/C 414/29

    Case C-530/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 8 October 2015 — Melitta France SAS and Others v Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l'Énergie

    23

    2015/C 414/30

    Case C-552/15: Action brought on 23 October 2015 — European Commission v Ireland

    23

     

    General Court

    2015/C 414/31

    Case T-552/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Oil Turbo Compressor v Council (Action for annulment — Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Time-limit for bringing proceedings — Out of time — Inadmissibility — Claim for damages — Inadmissibility)

    25

    2015/C 414/32

    Case T-597/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Calida v OHIM — Quanzhou Green Garments (dadida) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Figurative mark dadida — Earlier Community word mark CALIDA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)

    25

    2015/C 414/33

    Case T-636/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Trekstor v OHIM — MSI Technology (MovieStation) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark MovieStation — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52 of Regulation No 207/2009)

    26

    2015/C 414/34

    Case T-649/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Trekstor v OHIM (SmartTV Station) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark SmartTV Station — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

    27

    2015/C 414/35

    Case T-96/14: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Vimeo v OHIM — PT Comunicações (VIMEO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark VIMEO — Earlier Community figurative mark meo — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No coexistence of the marks — Likelihood of confusion)

    27

    2015/C 414/36

    Case T-130/14: Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2015 — Council v Simpson (Appeals — Civil service — Officials — Advancement in grade — Classification in grade — Decision not to award the person concerned grade AD 9 after he had passed a grade AD 9 open competition — Distortion of the evidence)

    28

    2015/C 414/37

    Case T-137/14: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — I Castellani v OHIM — Chomarat (Representation of a circle) (Community trade mark — Revocation procedure — Figurative mark representing a circle — Genuine use of a mark — Extent of use — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Shape which differs by elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark — Rights of the defence — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

    29

    2015/C 414/38

    Case T-264/14: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Hansen v OHIM (WIN365) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark WIN365 — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    29

    2015/C 414/39

    Case T-431/14: Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2015 — Volkswagen v OHIM (CHOICE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark CHOICE — Mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    30

    2015/C 414/40

    Case T-714/14: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — David Bonney v OHIM — Bruno (ATHEIST) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ATHEIST — Earlier national word mark athé — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    31

    2015/C 414/41

    Case T-822/14: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Geilenkothen Fabrik für Schutzkleidung v OHIM (Cottonfeel) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Cottonfeel — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    31

    2015/C 414/42

    Case T-560/15 P: Appeal brought on 28 September 2015 by LM against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 July 2015 in Case F-109/14, LM v Commission

    32

    2015/C 414/43

    Case T-578/15: Action brought on 30 September 2015 — Azur Space Solar Power v OHIM (Representation of a solar cell)

    33

    2015/C 414/44

    Case T-583/15: Action brought on 5 October 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM (Representation of a peace symbol)

    33

    2015/C 414/45

    Case T-590/15: Action brought on 12 October 2015 — Onix Asigurări SA v EIOPA

    34

    2015/C 414/46

    Case T-592/15: Action brought on 12 October 2015 — Novartis v OHIM — SK Chemicals (Representation of a patch)

    35

    2015/C 414/47

    Case T-593/15: Action brought on 14 October 2015 — The Art Company B & S v OHIM — G-Star Raw (THE ART OF RAW)

    36

    2015/C 414/48

    Case T-596/15: Action brought on 19 October 2015 — Batmore Capital v. OHIM — Univers Poche (POCKETBOOK)

    37

    2015/C 414/49

    Case T-604/15: Action brought on 27 October 2015 — Ertico — Its Europe/Commission

    38

     

    European Union Civil Service Tribunal

    2015/C 414/50

    Case F-99/15: Action brought on 6 July 2015 — ZZ and Others v EIB

    40

    2015/C 414/51

    Case F-100/15: Action brought on 6 July 2015 — 6 July 2015 v EIB

    41

    2015/C 414/52

    Case F-124/15: Action brought on 22 September 2015 — ZZ v Council

    42

    2015/C 414/53

    Case F-126/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — ZZ and Others v Court of Justice

    42

    2015/C 414/54

    Case F-127/15: Action brought on 29 September 2015 — ZZ v Commission

    43

    2015/C 414/55

    Case F-128/15: Action brought on 30 September 2015 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

    43

    2015/C 414/56

    Case F-129/15: Action brought on 30 September 2015 — ZZ v Commission

    44

    2015/C 414/57

    Case F-131/15: Action brought on 9 October 2015 — ZZ v Commission

    45

    2015/C 414/58

    Case F-133/15: Action brought on 12 October 2015 — ZZ v Commission

    45


    EN

     

    Top