Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020CN0660

    Case C-660/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 4 December 2020 — MK v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH

    OJ C 62, 22.2.2021, p. 17–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.2.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 62/17

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 4 December 2020 — MK v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH

    (Case C-660/20)

    (2021/C 62/21)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Bundesarbeitsgericht

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: MK

    Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Lufthansa CityLine GmbH

    Questions referred

    1.

    Does a national statutory provision treat part-time workers in a less favourable manner than comparable full-time workers within the meaning of Clause 4.1 of the Framework Agreement on part-time work annexed to Directive 97/81/EC (1) if it permits additional remuneration for part-time and full-time workers to be uniformly contingent on the same number of working hours having been exceeded, and therefore allows account to be taken of the overall remuneration, and not of the component of the remuneration that comprises the additional remuneration?

    2.

    If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:

    Is a national statutory provision which allows an entitlement to additional remuneration to be made conditional on the same number of working hours being exceeded uniformly in the case of both part-time and full-time workers compatible with Clause 4.1 and the principle of pro rata temporis in Clause 4.2 of the Framework Agreement on part-time work annexed to Directive 97/81/EC if the purpose of the additional remuneration is to compensate for a particular workload?

    (1)  Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC (OJ 1998 L 14, p. 9).

    Top