EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CA0118
Case C-118/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — JY v Wiener Landesregierung (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Articles 20 and 21 TFEU — Scope — Renunciation of the nationality of one Member State in order to obtain the nationality of another Member State in accordance with the assurance given by the latter to naturalise the person concerned — Revocation of that assurance on grounds of public policy or public security — Principle of proportionality — Statelessness)
Case C-118/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — JY v Wiener Landesregierung (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Articles 20 and 21 TFEU — Scope — Renunciation of the nationality of one Member State in order to obtain the nationality of another Member State in accordance with the assurance given by the latter to naturalise the person concerned — Revocation of that assurance on grounds of public policy or public security — Principle of proportionality — Statelessness)
Case C-118/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — JY v Wiener Landesregierung (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Articles 20 and 21 TFEU — Scope — Renunciation of the nationality of one Member State in order to obtain the nationality of another Member State in accordance with the assurance given by the latter to naturalise the person concerned — Revocation of that assurance on grounds of public policy or public security — Principle of proportionality — Statelessness)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 7–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 4–4
(GA)
|
14.3.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 119/7 |
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — JY v Wiener Landesregierung
(Case C-118/20) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Citizenship of the Union - Articles 20 and 21 TFEU - Scope - Renunciation of the nationality of one Member State in order to obtain the nationality of another Member State in accordance with the assurance given by the latter to naturalise the person concerned - Revocation of that assurance on grounds of public policy or public security - Principle of proportionality - Statelessness)
(2022/C 119/09)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: JY
Defendant: Wiener Landesregierung
Operative part of the judgment
|
1. |
The situation of a person who, having the nationality of one Member State only, renounces that nationality and loses, as a result, his or her status of citizen of the Union, with a view to obtaining the nationality of another Member State, following the assurance given by the authorities of the latter Member State that he or she will be granted that nationality, falls, by reason of its nature and its consequences, within the scope of EU law where that assurance is revoked with the effect of preventing that person from recovering the status of citizen of the Union. |
|
2. |
Article 20 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the competent national authorities and, as the case may be, the national courts of the host Member State are required to ascertain whether the decision to revoke the assurance as to the grant of the nationality of that Member State, which makes the loss of the status of citizen of the Union permanent for the person concerned, is compatible with the principle of proportionality in the light of the consequences it entails for that person’s situation. That requirement of compatibility with the principle of proportionality is not satisfied where such a decision is based on administrative traffic offences which, under the applicable provisions of national law, give rise to a mere pecuniary penalty. |