Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CA0585

    Case C-585/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operaţional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 2 — Definition of ‘working time’ — Article 3 — Minimum period of daily rest — Workers having concluded several employment contracts with the same employer — Application by worker)

    OJ C 182, 10.5.2021, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.5.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 182/11


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operaţional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale

    (Case C-585/19) (1)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 2 - Definition of ‘working time’ - Article 3 - Minimum period of daily rest - Workers having concluded several employment contracts with the same employer - Application by worker)

    (2021/C 182/15)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Referring court

    Tribunalul Bucureşti

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti

    Defendant: Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operaţional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale

    Operative part of the judgment

    Articles 2(1) and 3 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that, where an employee has concluded several contracts of employment with the same employer, the minimum daily rest period provided for in Article 3 thereof applies to those contracts taken as a whole and not to each of those contracts taken separately.


    (1)  OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.


    Top