This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CN0541
Case C-541/14 P: Appeal brought on 26 November 2014 by Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S against the judgment delivered on 26 September 2014 in Case T-615/11 Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S v European Commission
Case C-541/14 P: Appeal brought on 26 November 2014 by Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S against the judgment delivered on 26 September 2014 in Case T-615/11 Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S v European Commission
Case C-541/14 P: Appeal brought on 26 November 2014 by Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S against the judgment delivered on 26 September 2014 in Case T-615/11 Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S v European Commission
OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p. 16–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
2.2.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 34/16 |
Appeal brought on 26 November 2014 by Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S against the judgment delivered on 26 September 2014 in Case T-615/11 Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S v European Commission
(Case C-541/14 P)
(2015/C 034/18)
Language of the case: Danish
Parties
Appellant: Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S (represented by: B. Jacobi and P. Vesterdorf, advokater)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark, Republic of Malta, Betfair Group plc, Betfair International Ltd, European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA)
Form of order sought
1. |
Set aside the General Court’s judgment of 26 September 2014 in Case T-615/11 Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus concerning the measure C 35/10 (ex N 302/10) relating to Denmark’s implementation of duties on online gambling in the Danish Gaming Duties Act, under which the appellant has no interest in bringing proceedings. |
2. |
Order the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of the appellant, and order the intervener to bear its own costs for the proceedings before the General Court and the Court of Justice. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
1. |
The appellant submits that the General Court was incorrect in holding that the appellant has no interest in bringing proceedings, since the appellant fulfils the criteria in Article 263 Treaty on Functioning of the European Union to bring proceedings against the EU Commission. |
2. |
The appellant further submits that, in its judgment of 26 September 2014 in Case T-615/11 Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus, the General Court erred in law in a manner detrimental to the appellant’s interests by:
|
3. |
The appellant submits that the casino is individually concerned, since:
|