Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009CA0170

    Case C-170/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/60/EC — Money laundering and terrorist financing — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

    OJ C 100, 17.4.2010, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    17.4.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 100/8


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — European Commission v French Republic

    (Case C-170/09) (1)

    (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2005/60/EC - Money laundering and terrorist financing - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

    2010/C 100/11

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Peere and P. Dejmek, Agents)

    Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and B. Messmer, Agents)

    Re:

    Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have taken or communicated, within the prescribed period, all the necessary measures to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ 2005 L 309, p. 15)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

    2.

    Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 153, 4.07.2009.


    Top