This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CB0636
Case C-636/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Tolnatext Bt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Union Customs Code — Article 22(6) — Article 29 — Right to be heard — Procedures initiated ex officio — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Case C-636/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Tolnatext Bt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Union Customs Code — Article 22(6) — Article 29 — Right to be heard — Procedures initiated ex officio — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Case C-636/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Tolnatext Bt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Union Customs Code — Article 22(6) — Article 29 — Right to be heard — Procedures initiated ex officio — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
OJ C 382, 20.9.2021, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.9.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 382/6 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Tolnatext Bt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
(Case C-636/20) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Union Customs Code - Article 22(6) - Article 29 - Right to be heard - Procedures initiated ex officio - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2021/C 382/07)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Pécsi Törvényszék
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Tolnatext Bt.
Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék (Pécs Court, Hungary), made by decision of 30 October 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.