Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021CN0245

    Case C-245/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 April 2021 –Bundesrepublik Deutschland represented by the Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat v MA, PB

    OJ C 278, 12.7.2021, p. 27–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    19/04/2021
    Date lodged:
    19/04/2021
    Author:
    Court of Justice
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    German
    Type of procedure:
    Reference for a preliminary ruling
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    • Submits a preliminary question about 32013R0604 article 27 paragraph 3 point (c)
    • Submits a preliminary question about 32013R0604 article 27 paragraph 4
    • Submits a preliminary question about 32013R0604 article 29 paragraph 1
    Link

    12.7.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 278/27

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 April 2021 –Bundesrepublik Deutschland represented by the Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat v MA, PB

    (Case C-245/21)

    (2021/C 278/38)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Bundesverwaltungsgericht

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Respondents in the appeal on a point of law: MA, PB

    Questions referred

    1.

    Does suspension by the authorities of the implementation of a transfer decision, which is revocable only on account of the fact that transfers are (temporarily) impossible in fact due to the COVID-19 pandemic, fall within the scope of Article 27(4) of the Dublin III Regulation (1) during appeal proceedings?

    2.

    If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Does such a suspension decision interrupt the time limit for transfer pursuant to Article 29(1) of the Dublin III Regulation?

    3.

    If Question 2 is answered in the affirmative: Does this also apply if, prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, a court had dismissed an application by the asylum seeker pursuant to Article 27(3)(c) of the Dublin III Regulation for implementation of the transfer decision to be suspended pending the outcome of the appeal proceedings?

    (1)  Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).

    Top