Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020TN0488

    Case T-488/20: Action brought on 5 August 2020 — Guerlain v EUIPO (Shape of an oblong, tapered and cylindrical lipstick)

    OJ C 320, 28.9.2020, p. 26–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    05/08/2020
    Date lodged:
    05/08/2020
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    French
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Defendant:
    European Union Intellectual Property Office
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    28.9.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 320/26

    Action brought on 5 August 2020 — Guerlain v EUIPO (Shape of an oblong, tapered and cylindrical lipstick)

    (Case T-488/20)

    (2020/C 320/57)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Guerlain (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: Application for EU tridimensional mark (Shape of an oblong, tapered and cylindrical lipstick) — Application for registration No 17 958 667

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2020 in Case R 2292/2019-1

    Forms of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top