This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018CA0360
Case C-360/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Cargill Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Sugar sector — Production levy — Effectiveness — Right to reimbursement of sums unduly paid — Applicability of national rules on limitation periods — Principle of effectiveness)
Case C-360/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Cargill Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Sugar sector — Production levy — Effectiveness — Right to reimbursement of sums unduly paid — Applicability of national rules on limitation periods — Principle of effectiveness)
Case C-360/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Cargill Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Sugar sector — Production levy — Effectiveness — Right to reimbursement of sums unduly paid — Applicability of national rules on limitation periods — Principle of effectiveness)
OJ C 61, 24.2.2020, p. 5–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 19/12/2019
- Date lodged:
- 04/06/2018
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62018CJ0360
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
24.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 61/5 |
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Cargill Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld
(Case C-360/18) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 - Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Sugar sector - Production levy - Effectiveness - Right to reimbursement of sums unduly paid - Applicability of national rules on limitation periods - Principle of effectiveness)
(2020/C 61/06)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Finanzgericht Düsseldorf
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Cargill Deutschland GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Krefeld
Operative part of the judgment
Council Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 of 2 December 2013 fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for the 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 marketing years, the coefficient required for calculating the additional levy for the 2001/2002 and 2004/2005 marketing years and the amount to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference between the maximum levy and the levy to be charged for the 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2005/2006 marketing years must be interpreted as:
|
— |
meaning that the sums unduly paid by economic operators by way of those production levies must be reimbursed under national law, in particular within the limitation periods provided for by that law, in compliance with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness; and as |
|
— |
precluding national rules which, as interpreted by the competent courts, provide that the applicable limitation period during which reimbursement of unduly paid sugar production levies may be requested expired before that regulation entered into force, making it practically impossible to exercise the right, conferred on those economic operators by the EU legal order, to obtain reimbursement of those levies for the marketing years covered by that regulation. |
